Integra Sources

Small turnkey electronic design house covering hardware and firmware in one team

Founded 2014 | Astana, Kazakhstan | 11–50 employees

4.3 / 5

firmware-developmentelectrical-engineeringpcb-hardware-designiot-connectivityembedded-consulting

Overview Tech stack Pricing Pros & cons Alternatives FAQ

What is Integra Sources?

Integra Sources, founded in 2014, is a compact custom hardware and firmware shop with public sources disagreeing on both its exact headquarters (most list Astana, Kazakhstan) and current headcount (roughly 24 to 51 employees, depending on the source). At this size, turnkey delivery — electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, embedded firmware, and kernel/driver development for Windows, Linux, macOS, and Android — all under one small team is the actual value proposition: no coordinating separate hardware and software agencies, which matters more for a startup buyer than choosing between generalist scale options.

Integra Sources works primarily with clients in Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Turnkey hardware-plus-firmware delivery from a single small team, removing the need to coordinate separate hardware and firmware agencies.

Integra Sources tech stack and services

C/C++FreeRTOSEmbedded LinuxWindows/macOS/Android driversPCB design (power electronics, FPGA)

Service area
Firmware Development
Electrical Engineering
PCB / Hardware Design
IoT & Connectivity
Embedded Consulting

Integra Sources pricing

Short answer: Integra Sources uses a fixed project pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.

Engagement model	Typical range	Best for
Fixed project	From not disclosed	Well-defined scope

Integra Sources does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.

Integra Sources pros and cons

Advantages	Things to consider
+One team handles electronic design, PCB layout, FPGA, and firmware without the client coordinating separate hardware and software agencies	-Public sources disagree on both headquarters location and headcount, making delivery capacity harder to verify precisely
+250+ completed projects reported despite a small team size, suggesting efficient project turnover for a boutique this size	-Small team size limits fit for programs needing multiple concurrent workstreams
+Kernel/driver development spans four major operating systems (Windows, Linux, macOS, Android), broader OS coverage than most similarly sized boutiques	-No public case studies with named enterprise clients to independently verify scale claims

Integra Sources vs alternatives

How Integra Sources compares to the other top Embedded Software Development agencies.

Company	Best for	Key difference	Rating	Compare
Lemberg Solutions	Teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream...	Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients	4.8	Full comparison
Pengutronix	Teams needing the deepest possible Linux kernel specialist,...	The purest specialist-vs-generalist case on this list: a tiny team with independently verifiable upstream Linux kernel contributions no larger firm can match layer-for-layer	4.6	Full comparison
MicroSys Electronics	Teams building on NXP Arm Cortex hardware wanting...	The smallest, narrowest specialist on this list — an NXP Gold Partner focused solely on Arm Cortex System-on-Modules and BSPs for nearly 50 years, not a scaled-down generalist	4.6	Full comparison
SYSGO	Safety-critical teams wanting specialist focus with the financial...	A ~100-person specialist sized to combine genuine product focus (SIL 4 PikeOS) with Thales Group financial backing for multi-decade safety-support commitments	4.5	Full comparison
DornerWorks	Aerospace/defense teams wanting a specialist, not a reassigned...	Two decades of unbroken aerospace/defense/medical focus with a narrower FPGA/Xen hypervisor specialty within that — genuine depth, not a boutique-branded generalist practice	4.5	Full comparison
ByteSnap Design	UK teams wanting direct access to the engineers...	38-person team small enough that buyers work directly with the engineers holding named semiconductor partnerships, not routed through account-management layers	4.5	Full comparison
Sirin Software	Semiconductor teams wanting a boutique with genuine multi-protocol...	11-50 person boutique with named depth across six wireless protocols — a narrower, more specific claim than most much larger generalist firms make about connectivity work	4.4	Full comparison
Witekio	Teams wanting chip-to-cloud breadth without stepping up to...	Deliberately broader than the smallest boutiques — full chip-to-cloud stack coverage while staying small enough that embedded remains the entire business	4.4	Full comparison
emlix	Industrial teams wanting Linux depth with more capacity...	60+ engineers gives more concurrent-program capacity than the smallest boutiques while remaining entirely focused on the embedded Linux layer, unlike a diversified generalist practice	4.3	Full comparison
Promwad	Programs needing hardware-through-manufacturing scope from a mid-size specialist.	Mid-size specialist (100+ engineers) large enough for hardware-through-manufacturing scope, while electronics design remains the entire business rather than one division	4.3	Full comparison
Klika Tech	AWS-native teams wanting global reach from a still-focused...	A specialist agency, not a generalist division — AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT/edge-to-cloud, with a genuinely global office footprint at a still-focused 180-person scale	4.2	Full comparison
Timesys	Teams needing long-term embedded Linux security patching as...	Nearly three-decade specialization in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) most generalist firms treat as an afterthought, now under Lynx Software Technologies	4.2	Full comparison
Vector Informatik	Automotive teams wanting large-scale support without cross-industry dilution.	A large organization (4,000+) that stayed narrowly focused on automotive embedded tooling rather than diversifying — scale without cross-industry generalist dilution	4.1	Full comparison
Elektrobit	Automotive OEMs wanting production-scale software backed by Tier...	Software running in 600M+ vehicles at production scale — depth backed by Continental's Tier 1 manufacturing relationships, but shaped by a large parent's priorities rather than boutique independence	4.1	Full comparison
Enea	Buyers wanting mid-scale RTOS expertise with public-company financial...	Nasdaq Stockholm-listed RTOS vendor with public governance and audited financials — a trust signal neither the smallest boutiques nor most private generalist firms can offer	4.1	Full comparison
Bosch Engineering	OEMs wanting Bosch-grade process discipline over boutique independence.	A wholly-owned Bosch Group engineering subsidiary bringing Bosch's manufacturing-grade process discipline, trading independent-boutique focus for Bosch-ecosystem scale	4.0	Full comparison
DMC, Inc.	Teams wanting embedded work bundled with manufacturing/test automation...	A boutique-sized firm (51-200) that is nonetheless a generalist in practice — embedded software is one of several practice areas, not the sole focus, unlike the pure-play specialists on this list	4.0	Full comparison
Data Respons	Nordic teams wanting scale with (so far) retained...	1,400-person embedded specialist that has retained a genuinely focused practice through two ownership transitions, rather than being folded into a diversified engineering pool	3.9	Full comparison
Softeq Development	Teams wanting one full-stack generalist vendor rather than...	A 500+ person generalist by structure — embedded/hardware is a dedicated practice within a broader full-stack business, not the entire company, unlike the boutiques on this list	3.9	Full comparison
KPIT Technologies	Large automotive OEM programs needing scale without cross-industry...	12,000+ engineer scale that has stayed automotive-only rather than diversifying across unrelated industries — large but not a true cross-industry generalist	3.9	Full comparison
Intellias	Automotive programs wanting proven navigation depth inside a...	A 3,000+ person generalist IT outsourcer whose automotive/navigation practice specifically has proven depth (10+ car brands, 10M+ vehicles), even though the wider portfolio is generalist	3.8	Full comparison
N-iX	Teams wanting embedded/IoT work bundled with broader cloud...	A 2,200+ person generalist outsourcer whose 15-year IoT/embedded practice is real but structurally secondary to the firm's much larger cloud and data business	3.8	Full comparison
Innowise	Buyers wanting embedded work bundled with broader software...	A generalist IT outsourcer by design (broad custom software, staff aug across many domains) where embedded/IoT is a delivery line, not the founding specialty	3.7	Full comparison
Avenga	Enterprises wanting IoT engineering inside a broad digital...	A generalist by construction, not just scale — assembled through multiple mergers since 2017, meaning more process variation across teams than a boutique built around one focus from day one	3.7	Full comparison
Tata Elxsi	Enterprises needing embedded engineering alongside media or healthcare...	Generalist-conglomerate scale (13,000+) under the Tata Group, where automotive embedded capability competes for resourcing against equally significant media and healthcare R&D lines	3.7	Full comparison
Cyient	Aerospace and defense programs needing embedded avionics engineering...	Generalist-conglomerate scale (15,000+) with aerospace avionics as one named specialty within a much broader engineering portfolio, not the sole focus	3.6	Full comparison
eInfochips	Enterprise clients wanting embedded engineering backed by Arrow's...	Embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger parent (Arrow Electronics), trading independent-boutique focus for direct component-sourcing access	3.6	Full comparison
GlobalLogic	Enterprises wanting embedded work inside a broad Hitachi-backed...	Generalist-conglomerate scale (10,000+, Hitachi-owned) where embedded is one capability among many, with a named Elektrobit partnership as the clearest evidence of specific traction	3.5	Full comparison
Wind River	Teams needing a certified commercial RTOS platform rather...	Fundamentally a certified RTOS product/licensing vendor, not an agency in the traditional specialist-vs-generalist sense, with over 40 years of production history and several ownership changes	3.5	Full comparison
Luxoft	Automotive OEMs needing infotainment and digital cockpit software...	Nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration	3.5	Full comparison
QuEST Global	Multi-vertical enterprises needing embedded engineering alongside broader R&D.	Among the most diversified generalist engineering firms on this list — 20,000+ people across seven-plus unrelated verticals, with embedded as one capability within a very broad portfolio	3.4	Full comparison
Capgemini Engineering	Global enterprises needing embedded work inside a broad...	One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered — about as far from a boutique specialist as this list gets	3.4	Full comparison
HCLTech	Global enterprises wanting embedded engineering as part of...	The largest firm on this list by a wide margin (227,000+) — the definitive generalist counterpoint to the boutique specialists at the top, with embedded several organizational layers removed from company scale	3.3	Full comparison

See all Integra Sources alternatives

Integra Sources FAQ

What is Integra Sources?

Small turnkey electronic design house covering hardware and firmware in one team

How much does Integra Sources charge?

Integra Sources uses fixed project pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.

What tech stack does Integra Sources use?

Integra Sources works with C/C++, FreeRTOS, Embedded Linux, Windows/macOS/Android drivers, PCB design (power electronics, FPGA). Primary industries served include Consumer Electronics, Robotics, Industrial IoT, Medical devices.

Is Integra Sources right for enterprise?

Early-stage teams wanting one small agency for hardware and firmware. 11–50 team size. Key consideration: Public sources disagree on both headquarters location and headcount, making delivery capacity harder to verify precisely.

What are the best Integra Sources alternatives?

The best alternatives to Integra Sources depend on your use case. Top options are:

Lemberg Solutions: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by iso certification and named checkable clients
Pengutronix: the purest specialist-vs-generalist case on this list: a tiny team with independently verifiable upstream linux kernel contributions no larger firm can match layer-for-layer
MicroSys Electronics: the smallest, narrowest specialist on this list — an nxp gold partner focused solely on arm cortex system-on-modules and bsps for nearly 50 years, not a scaled-down generalist

See full alternatives list

Compare Integra Sources with other Embedded Software Development agencies

Verify all details directly with Integra Sources before making a decision.