Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.4/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream programs. Sirin Software is the stronger option for semiconductor teams wanting a boutique with genuine multi-protocol wireless depth. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 200+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients | 11-50 person boutique with named depth across six wireless protocols — a narrower, more specific claim than most much larger generalist firms make about connectivity work |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Zephyr, FreeRTOS, ThreadX |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home, Semiconductor |
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. At 200+ people, it sits well above the smallest boutiques on this list but far below the multi-thousand-engineer generalist firms — a size where embedded is still unambiguously the firm's core business, not one line item competing for resourcing against unrelated business units, while still having enough bench depth (electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, cybersecurity) to staff a program with several parallel workstreams. ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) back the claim with checkable references rather than scale alone.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software, founded in 2014, runs an 11-50 person team headquartered in Pompano Beach, Florida with R&D centers in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, specifically on SDKs, firmware, middleware, and driver development for semiconductor companies and IoT product teams. Small size here maps to genuine specialization rather than a limitation: named depth across six wireless protocols (Wi-Fi, BLE, Matter, UWB, NFC, LoRaWAN) spanning Linux, Zephyr, FreeRTOS, and ThreadX is a narrower, deeper claim than most much larger generalist firms make about connectivity work.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | ✓ |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home |
| Best use cases | Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams, Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Semiconductor companies needing SDK, driver, and middleware development from a specialist boutique rather than a generalist firm, Matter/Thread smart-home products requiring simultaneous multi-protocol wireless firmware support |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a specific, checkable quality signal beyond team size alone |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support reference-checking before committing |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, standard across every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies with specific outcomes rather than generic capability claims |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — teams wanting one specialist agency through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against smaller boutiques or larger generalists requires a direct quote |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Named coverage across six wireless protocols is a narrower, more specific claim than the generic 'connectivity expertise' most larger firms list |
| + | Works directly with semiconductor companies on SDK and driver development, closer to the chip than downstream product-firmware generalist work |
| + | Boutique size means the client-facing team is likely the same team doing the engineering, not separate sales and delivery layers |
| - | Small team (11-50, varying by source) limits capacity for programs needing several parallel workstreams |
| - | No public pricing tiers or minimum engagement figures for pre-qualification |
| - | Multi-protocol breadth within a small team means depth in any one protocol may be shallower than a single-protocol specialist |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams.
Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: semiconductor companies needing SDK, driver, and middleware development from a specialist boutique rather than a generalist firm.
11-50 person boutique with named depth across six wireless protocols — a narrower, more specific claim than most much larger generalist firms make about connectivity work. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home, Semiconductor.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Sirin Software (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Semiconductor companies needing SDK, driver, and middleware development from a specialist boutique rather than a generalist firm | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| Matter/Thread smart-home products requiring simultaneous multi-protocol wireless firmware support | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients.
Sirin Software (4.4/5) is worth a look if you need Matter/Thread smart-home products requiring simultaneous multi-protocol wireless firmware support. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Sirin Software?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: named coverage across six wireless protocols is a narrower, more specific claim than the generic 'connectivity expertise' most larger firms list.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Sirin Software uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Sirin Software?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Sirin Software?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: 11-50 person boutique with named depth across six wireless protocols — a narrower, more specific claim than most much larger generalist firms make about connectivity work. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.