eInfochips vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (3.6/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.5/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for enterprise clients wanting embedded engineering backed by Arrow's supply chain. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive OEMs needing infotainment and digital cockpit software at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2000 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 18,000 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger parent (Arrow Electronics), trading independent-boutique focus for direct component-sourcing access | Nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++ | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor | Automotive |
eInfochips vs Luxoft: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering firm, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company. At 1,000-5,000 people and owned by a much larger distribution company, this sits toward the generalist end of the spectrum — embedded engineering is one line of business inside Arrow's broader operations, with component-sourcing access as a genuine differentiator that comes with that structural trade-off.
Luxoft
Luxoft, founded in 2000, became a recognized automotive software systems integrator before DXC Technology acquired it in 2019. At nearly 18,000 people under a large enterprise IT parent, this is well past generalist scale — the real question for a buyer is whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio, worth confirming directly rather than assuming from the brand name.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Capability | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Criterion | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Dimension | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare | Automotive |
| Best use cases | Consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware, Enterprise IoT deployments requiring both hardware and cloud integration | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Acquisition by Arrow Electronics gives direct access to component sourcing and semiconductor supply-chain relationships |
| + | 500+ documented product engineering deliveries over a 30-year history |
| + | Design centers across India, Japan, and the US support round-the-clock delivery coverage |
| - | Acquired by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is now one line of business inside a much larger distribution company, diluting the boutique-specialist focus |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| - | Team size estimates vary significantly across sources, making exact capacity hard to verify |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Named in-vehicle infotainment platform (AMBER) demonstrates active investment in digital cockpit software |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed OEM programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — confirm directly whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization has been preserved inside DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive vertical |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware.
Embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger parent (Arrow Electronics), trading independent-boutique focus for direct component-sourcing access. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer electronics programs needing component sourcing alongside firmware | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Enterprise IoT deployments requiring both hardware and cloud integration | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit programs needing Android Automotive expertise | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Luxoft
eInfochips (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger parent (Arrow Electronics), trading independent-boutique focus for direct component-sourcing access.
Luxoft (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need OEM programs wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Luxoft FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Luxoft?
eInfochips (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: acquisition by Arrow Electronics gives direct access to component sourcing and semiconductor supply-chain relationships. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers.
How do eInfochips and Luxoft differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Luxoft?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Luxoft?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger parent (Arrow Electronics), trading independent-boutique focus for direct component-sourcing access. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: nearly 18,000 people under DXC Technology — well past generalist scale, where the real question is whether the pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 18,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.