Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Promwad (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams wanting specialist depth with capacity for multi-workstream programs. Promwad is the stronger option for programs needing hardware-through-manufacturing scope from a mid-size specialist. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2004 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Essen, Germany (engineering centers in Latvia and Serbia) |
| Team size | 200+ | 101–250 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients | Mid-size specialist (100+ engineers) large enough for hardware-through-manufacturing scope, while electronics design remains the entire business rather than one division |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | C/C++, Embedded Linux (Yocto), Android embedded |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecom, Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. At 200+ people, it sits well above the smallest boutiques on this list but far below the multi-thousand-engineer generalist firms — a size where embedded is still unambiguously the firm's core business, not one line item competing for resourcing against unrelated business units, while still having enough bench depth (electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, cybersecurity) to staff a program with several parallel workstreams. ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) back the claim with checkable references rather than scale alone.
Promwad
Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Essen, Germany with additional engineering centers in Latvia and Serbia, Promwad has built a 100+ engineer team around end-to-end electronics design: PCB layout, FPGA, embedded software, and coordination through contract manufacturing. At just over 100 people, Promwad is a mid-size specialist — large enough to run a hardware program through manufacturing handoff, still narrow enough in focus that embedded and electronics design is the entire business, not a division inside a larger generalist firm.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams, Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Connected hardware programs needing PCB, FPGA, and embedded Linux from a mid-size specialist rather than a generalist division, Programs requiring contract manufacturing coordination alongside development |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a specific, checkable quality signal beyond team size alone |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support reference-checking before committing |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, standard across every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies with specific outcomes rather than generic capability claims |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — teams wanting one specialist agency through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against smaller boutiques or larger generalists requires a direct quote |
| Promwad | |
|---|---|
| + | Over 20 years combining PCB layout, FPGA design, and embedded software under one specialist agency, not a division of a larger generalist firm |
| + | 100+ engineers across German, Latvian, and Serbian centers give more capacity than the smallest boutiques while staying purely embedded/electronics-focused |
| + | Contract manufacturing coordination extends the engagement past pure development into production handoff |
| - | Mid-size team sits between boutique specialists and large engineering conglomerates — verify concurrent-program bandwidth directly for large needs |
| - | No large named enterprise case studies published to independently verify scale claims |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams.
Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Promwad?
A typical fit: connected hardware programs needing PCB, FPGA, and embedded Linux from a mid-size specialist rather than a generalist division.
Mid-size specialist (100+ engineers) large enough for hardware-through-manufacturing scope, while electronics design remains the entire business rather than one division. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecom, Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Promwad |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Promwad |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Promwad (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Promwad fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programs needing specialist embedded depth with enough bench strength for several concurrent workstreams | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Medical device development requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management from a dedicated embedded team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Connected hardware programs needing PCB, FPGA, and embedded Linux from a mid-size specialist rather than a generalist division | Limited | Strong | Promwad |
| Programs requiring contract manufacturing coordination alongside development | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients.
Promwad (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need programs requiring contract manufacturing coordination alongside development. If your situation matches that, Promwad is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: large enough (200+) to staff multiple parallel workstreams without embedded competing internally against unrelated business units for resourcing. Promwad's strongest advantage: over 20 years combining PCB layout, FPGA design, and embedded software under one specialist agency, not a division of a larger generalist firm.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Promwad differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Promwad uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Promwad?
Promwad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: sized to keep embedded as an undivided core focus while still fielding multiple parallel workstreams, backed by ISO certification and named checkable clients. Promwad's primary differentiator is: mid-size specialist (100+ engineers) large enough for hardware-through-manufacturing scope, while electronics design remains the entire business rather than one division. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 101–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.